Record🤔

uri:

"at://did:plc:eajo6em6hgdmhob47l66rqds/app.bsky.feed.post/3kzcpwhurpl2s"

cid:

"bafyreiem6fy3m6ty63ygywljleisk3wyejc3snyf52gpoplgc3vv2z6adq"

value:

text:

"#worldcon"

$type:

"app.bsky.feed.post"

embed:

$type:

"app.bsky.embed.images"

images:

• alt:

  "In recent years, it feels like The Ministry for the Future has been mentioned at every climate panel at every SFF conference or convention I have been to, and plenty of non-SFF events. I reviewed it positively when it arrived (twice actually). It may well be the best SFF has to offer in terms of plausible positive climate futures. It is really important to stress that the best is really awful. The policy actions are not credible on current timescales. The finance innovations are not credible on current timescales. The presentation of solar radiation management was poor at the time and has already dated badly. The book misunderstands the relationship between blockchain and central banking and also fudges the carbon cost of blockchain. It contains disastrous science errors like leaving out the “well below” of the Paris Agreement. Everything is weighted wrong. The 200 Watt Society (and deep demand reduction) should have whole chapters. Refreezing arctic ice should have a paragraph. Not St"

  image:

  

  View blob content

  $type:

  "blob"

  ref:

  $link:

  "bafkreifq7dqztve3en7jw3h74n3dqczi3irwbtcsvvgfzij2x7slvo6nh4"

  mimeType:

  "image/jpeg"

  size:

  612831

  aspectRatio:

  width:

  923

  height:

  2000

langs:

• "en"

facets:

• index:

  byteEnd:

  9

  byteStart:

  0

  features:

  • tag:

    "worldcon"

    $type:

    "app.bsky.richtext.facet#tag"

createdAt:

"2024-08-09T19:51:41.557Z"