Record🤔

uri:

"at://did:plc:xhrel3d6gxb2tt26u5rqo5y3/app.bsky.feed.post/3l3vtudn2wl2a"

cid:

"bafyreieck43xezzszweu5gvilo4w73dopzcepb5dtkcvixsxygu3gcmsvq"

value:

text:

"BTW I did mention bsky doing research and considering AP in the section on "Why choose a narrow, gatekeeping, ahistorical ActivityPub-only definition of the Fediverse?" in the followup post at privacy.thenexus.today/is-bluesky-p..."

$type:

"app.bsky.feed.post"

embed:

$type:

"app.bsky.embed.images"

images:

• alt:

  "I get it. Many ActivityPub loyalists remain resentful that after considering ActivityPub, Bluesky went on to develop its own protocol AT. By contrast, Meta endorsed ActivityPub's value as platform for its new surveillance capitalism platform Threads, and Eugen described it as a "huge victory for our cause". But while I'm sympathetic to people who prefer a values-based definition of the Fediverse that excludes Bluesky and the rest of the corporate fediverse ... I personally have far less patience for a gatekeeping, ahistorical, ActivityPub-only argument for excluding Bluesky. They decided ActivityPub wasn't the best choice for them. Get over it already!"

  image:

  

  View blob content

  $type:

  "blob"

  ref:

  $link:

  "bafkreibnorvs7wcjqgfalwkg72dxdhhcgpnbbdlrpacfxba2wacnllbqw4"

  mimeType:

  "image/jpeg"

  size:

  455041

  aspectRatio:

  width:

  848

  height:

  858

langs:

• "en"

reply:

root:

cid:

"bafyreidbp3metuumecnzh3nqpq4rg5zypqnbk4jlzprvtcsq4dy7yyd6zq"

uri:

"at://did:plc:xhrel3d6gxb2tt26u5rqo5y3/app.bsky.feed.post/3l3qtab4yzu2o"

parent:

cid:

"bafyreib2pv7wcknwofoanulutasys43c4erpgbvgyxfiuv6fak2lulrbqq"

uri:

"at://did:plc:tms37vw5yfvwt5mbmvrbclym/app.bsky.feed.post/3l3vp7ygtae23"

facets:

• index:

  byteEnd:

  231

  byteStart:

  193

  features:

  • uri:

    "https://privacy.thenexus.today/is-bluesky-part-of-todays-fediverse/"

    $type:

    "app.bsky.richtext.facet#link"

createdAt:

"2024-09-11T21:13:02.819Z"