🏠
Author: mrchrisadams.bsky.social (did:plc:yufngvpjym46jacz4kgesvrk)

Record🤔

uri:
"at://did:plc:yufngvpjym46jacz4kgesvrk/app.bsky.feed.post/3kktahl6buy2y"
cid:
"bafyreib22yql4j5kyxpu5azadzomyhbnoy5xrx7ycf25v6oao32qfmydi4"
value:
text:
"I'm thinking mainly of @ketanjoshi.co and greensky when I read this, because a bunch of the posts I read on fedi essentially criticise it as outsourcing content moderation rather addressing it themselves.

Is "no climate denial" a thing you'd buy in an app store?

www.platformer.news/bluesky-publ..."
$type:
"app.bsky.feed.post"
embed:
$type:
"app.bsky.embed.images"
images:
  • alt:
    "It's built for publishers, too. Bluesky's custom feeds ought to be a playground for digital publishers. Soon I expect you'll be able to follow custom threads that show you all of a publication's reporting, plus posts from their journalists. Publishers can also create custom labels and apply them to posts, which could enable a fact-checking organization to add
"true" and "false" labels to viral posts that would be visible to anyone who subscribes to their feeds. And that's just one example: the customization allows publishers to do a lot of useful, trust-building work that simply is not possible elsewhere. (To name another example, custom labels enable organizations to effectively verify their own employees' accounts.)

It could be the future of content moderation. The past seven-plus years of mostly fruitless debate about online speech have focused on whether we ought to have more moderation or less. Bluesky is built to let us have it both ways."
    image:
    View blob content
    $type:
    "blob"
    ref:
    $link:
    "bafkreifz6l5lxctd7fal4lohxp5anzjobf2qrsfrxrrvsazjcl3q5owkvq"
    mimeType:
    "image/jpeg"
    size:
    802561
    aspectRatio:
    width:
    1484
    height:
    960
langs:
  • "en"
facets:
createdAt:
"2024-02-07T12:12:16.168Z"